<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backup Mail Exchangers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aptivate.org/2009/01/28/backup-mail-exchangers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aptivate.org/2009/01/28/backup-mail-exchangers/</link>
	<description>International I.T. Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:15:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.aptivate.org/2009/01/28/backup-mail-exchangers/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinderblog.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-114</guid>
		<description>That is good you found a solution to your problem.  Everyone should use a backup MX.  I&#039;ve used MXSave for my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mxsave.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;backup MX&lt;/a&gt; and it works very well.  They do recepient checking and have anti-spam measures so I&#039;ve never had a problem with receiving junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is good you found a solution to your problem.  Everyone should use a backup MX.  I&#8217;ve used MXSave for my <a href="http://www.mxsave.com" rel="nofollow">backup MX</a> and it works very well.  They do recepient checking and have anti-spam measures so I&#8217;ve never had a problem with receiving junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

