<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Large Wireless Networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aptivate.org/2010/01/05/wireless-networks-for-2000-clients/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aptivate.org/2010/01/05/wireless-networks-for-2000-clients/</link>
	<description>International I.T. Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest</title>
		<link>http://blog.aptivate.org/2010/01/05/wireless-networks-for-2000-clients/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aptivate.org/?p=233#comment-274</guid>
		<description>While there are some recommendations on purchasing high end &quot;enterprise grade&quot; gear (Cisco Aironet et al),  cost is obviously an issue, depending on what the implementation will be used for.

I took a look at the hardware specification of some mid- to high-end Linksys devices, and compared to the Ciscos. Their hardware specs were a match. Think &quot;crippleware&quot; in the Linksys, to target them out of the enterprise.

What I&#039;m getting at, instead of spending 1000usd on a Cisco Aironet, you could achieve a similar result buying a Linksys WRT600N at 200usd, replacing its firmware with DD-WRT and you have a device with performance exactly identical to (if not better than) some of Cisco&#039;s Aironet products at one fifth of the price.

We have also tried to stress-test some of the APs in our collection at one of the previous conferences. It was a Linksys WRT160N (running DD-WRT). It performed well with a maximum of 35 concurrent users, and did not seem to be stressed hardware-wise. Its only killer was when we tried extra-heavy torrenting through it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While there are some recommendations on purchasing high end &#8220;enterprise grade&#8221; gear (Cisco Aironet et al),  cost is obviously an issue, depending on what the implementation will be used for.</p>
<p>I took a look at the hardware specification of some mid- to high-end Linksys devices, and compared to the Ciscos. Their hardware specs were a match. Think &#8220;crippleware&#8221; in the Linksys, to target them out of the enterprise.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m getting at, instead of spending 1000usd on a Cisco Aironet, you could achieve a similar result buying a Linksys WRT600N at 200usd, replacing its firmware with DD-WRT and you have a device with performance exactly identical to (if not better than) some of Cisco&#8217;s Aironet products at one fifth of the price.</p>
<p>We have also tried to stress-test some of the APs in our collection at one of the previous conferences. It was a Linksys WRT160N (running DD-WRT). It performed well with a maximum of 35 concurrent users, and did not seem to be stressed hardware-wise. Its only killer was when we tried extra-heavy torrenting through it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamish</title>
		<link>http://blog.aptivate.org/2010/01/05/wireless-networks-for-2000-clients/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aptivate.org/?p=233#comment-261</guid>
		<description>This page has some good answers:

http://serverfault.com/questions/72767/why-is-internet-access-and-wi-fi-always-so-terrible-at-large-tech-conferences

It is about tech conferences, but the basic problem of getting lots of people on wifi in a single space is covered by the solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This page has some good answers:</p>
<p><a href="http://serverfault.com/questions/72767/why-is-internet-access-and-wi-fi-always-so-terrible-at-large-tech-conferences" rel="nofollow">http://serverfault.com/questions/72767/why-is-internet-access-and-wi-fi-always-so-terrible-at-large-tech-conferences</a></p>
<p>It is about tech conferences, but the basic problem of getting lots of people on wifi in a single space is covered by the solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

